Don't want to get dragged in? TOO BAD!!! Your comment made the perfect segue to a little bit of writing I made about a year ago, just before the election.

Enemies of Gay Marriage's biggest problem seems to not be that homosexuals exist or homosexual intercourse is wrong, but that the word "marriage" should only mean "the joining of a man and a woman." Kerry's idea tried to meet them halfway with civil unions. That was not a good idea because a gay couple wouldn't be
married, they would be in a
civil union.
It's the word: "Marriage" is an incredibly old institution, and "Civil Union" sounds like left-wing newspeak. That, and for some reason they don't provide as many benefits as Marriage. In essence, the fight isn't over the idea of marriage, but the word marriage.
From here, the solution looks simple enough. The government should strike words like marry, marriage and married from all documents and replace them with something less touchy, like "domestic partners" or "civil unions." This seems like a crazy huge step, but really isn't. The government has made all kinds of revisions like this before. It's the whole history of using politically correct language. However, unlike the switch from Nig*er to Negro to Black to African American, what with the saying "The older version was offensive," the spin should be "we understand that marriages still exist, but the government has no place in it. Marriages are spiritual, symbolic and above all personal undertakings. The government isn't a church, we can't unite two souls under God." It should be spun just so that people should still feel like they were and/ or could still get married, but the government wouldn't have anything to do about it. The marriage red tape from the government would still be filled out, just with the words "domestic partnership" instead of "marriage." This way, the government could effectively wash its hands of a gay couple getting married and calling themselves married. "That's their word, not ours. Those fags diddn't marry, they got domestically partnered," the government could say.
Liberal churches could allow gay marriages, and conservative churches could ban gay marriages.
Even nowadays where non-PC words have negative connotations, they never really stop people from using them in private, anyway. Most people don't say "developmentally disabled," they say "retarded."
...
Well,
I think it's a good idea.
EDIT: Not like it should really matter, or affect what people think of my idea(s), but I am indeed bi.